Updated July 2017, by Victoria E. Giraldo and Marcela Paz
Military service in Bolivia is compulsory for all men between the ages of 18 and 22. Men and women can volunteer from the age of 16.
Conscientious objection is not recognised by law and desertion is punishable by imprisonment.
Military service is obligatory and is stipulated by the Political Constitution of the State in Articles 108 and 249 in its Title III, on Duties. Law 1405 of 30 December 1992 establishes in its Article 7 that "it is the inexcusable duty of all Bolivian citizens, subject to military dispositions in time of war and national emergency, no citizen may refuse their services professions, technicians or scientists to the Armed Institution, when for special reasons qualified by Supreme Decree of the Executive Power and in fulfilment of its Constitutional Mission, they are required to preserve the Security, Integrity and Sovereignty of the Nation”
Active service is between 18 and 22 years and the duration of military service is 1 year. Recruitment is done through the Recruitment Centres and there recruits are split into different categories: skilled, unskilled, auxiliary and postponed. The 'student' or 'preliminary service' is for those aged 16 to 18 years, and the reserve service from the 29 to 45 years.
In 1996 the Armed Forces reintroduced the Preliminary Service for youth of both sexes on a voluntary basis through a presidential decree. This includes students from the fourth grade of secondary school. The number recruited for Premilitary Service is approximately 26,000 to 24,000 men and 2,000 women (General Military Service, 2012).
In accordance with the Law No. 954 of June 2017, Voluntary Military Service is established for 17-year-old males, with a duration of one year.
The decision was made despite the fact that in March 2016, the Plurinational Constitutional Tribunal established, through a ruling, that Compulsory Military Service must be for those aged 18 to 22, while pre-military service is from age 17 (for students in the fifth year of secondary education).
Law 954 stipulates that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will take “the necessary steps to ensure that the United Nations align the minimum age of voluntary military service and pre-military service in the binding declaration of the Plurinational State of Bolivia to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict.”
Voluntary military service for Women
On 9 June 2017, Law No. 954 was passed which, among other things, legalises military enlistment for women aged 18, but on a voluntary basis.
The Alternative Military Service SAR (Search and Rescue) is available for citizens who have reached the age of compulsory military service. In it, they coordinate search and rescue missions for aircraft in emergencies or accidents, rescue passengers and crew, as well as rescue operations in natural disasters. The duration of this service is 2 years.
Likewise, Article 20 of the Law on Persons with Disabilities provides that: "The functions of the Armed Forces shall be to: (a) make the Civil Service effective for persons with disabilities, according to the type and degree of disability, respectively, and b) To grant the corresponding libreta militar with the release of the stipulated cost, in the case of people with limited resources, to persons with disabilities who fail to access the Military Service or the Mandatory Civil Service, due to the type and degree of disability they present".
2 Conscientious objection
Conscientious objection is not recognised in law either for conscripts or for those who enlisted voluntarily.
Although conscientious objection is not legally recognised, this has not been always an obstacle to its application.
In 2003, a young man claimed conscientious objection. He refused to perform military service on religious grounds, tried to state his right of conscientious objection as stated in article 12 ACHR (or the Pact of San José), where it was indicated that this rule does not apply in Bolivia and he presented his case to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).
After more than a year (2004-2005), the State and the objector, with his sponsor the Ombudsman’s Office, reached a “friendly” settlement by which brought the complaint to an end. The Ministry of Defence agreed and handed over a libreta militar without the young man doing his service, but at an economic cost.
In the year 2016, a young man of 18 years received constitutional protection as a conscientious objector.
However, the Legislative Assembly still refuses to draft a law or regulation that establishes the scope and purpose of the right to conscientious objection by referring to the “problem” of the principle of equality of persons to the law, (the constitutional duty to provide compulsory military service vs. others that are totally exempt through the invocation of the right to freedom of conscience). Since they are not consecrated or duty regulated in the legal system of the State, the people of service age cannot invoke this right as an exception to the compulsory military service, and on their part, the authorities of the Armed Forces cannot respond to the request of the people who invoke it. However, judgement No. 0265/2016-S2 concludes that: "conscientious objection can not be applied directly and immediately, because there is no a regulation, (...) but alternatively, in the different classes that the state recognises, the interested parties must be subject to the observance of national domestic legislation on the right invoked”.
3 Draft evasion and desertion
Desertion or abandonment of militar service in peace time is sanctioned by the military penal code. The deserter will be subject to four years of imprisonment if the offender belongs to the class of generals, three if the one of superior officers, two if it is junior officer and one if they are cadets or students of military vocational training institutes or non-commissioned officers or classes. Likewise, attempted desertion at any time (in war or peace) is sanctioned with half of the respective penalties.
Ley Orgánica de las Fuerzas Armadas de la Nación "Comandantes De La Independencia de Bolivia" No1405.
Tribunal Constitucional Plurinacional. Sentencia Constitucional Plurinacional Nº 0265/206S2, sucre, 23 de marzo 2016. Disponible en: https://www.wri-irg.org/en/sites/default/files/public_files/SCP%20265%202016.pdf
BASES GENERALES PARA EL SERVICIO MILITAR OBLIGATORIO. Bolivia. Disponible en:http://www.mindef.gob.bo/mindef/sites/default/files/GENERALIDADES_-_SERVICIO_MILITAR_-_2012.pdf
Código Penal Militar. Decreto Ley No 13321. Disponible en: https://iccdb.hrlc.net/documents/implementations/pdf/Bolivia-Codigo_Penal_Militar.pdf
Ley Nº 954 de 9 de junio de 2017. Ley que regula el Servicio Militar voluntario en el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. http://senado.gob.bo/sites/default/files/leyesdiputados/LEY%20N%C2%B0%20954-2017.pdf
Bolivia – Objeción de conciencia – Sentencia Constitucional 1662/2003 . http://observatoriointernacional.com/?p=137
Law No 954 of June 9th, 2017. Law regulating the Voluntary Military Service in the Plurinational State of Bolivia. http://senado.gob.bo/sites/default/files/leyesdiputados/LEY%20N%C2%B0%20954-2017.PDF
Plans for an alternative 'Social Action Service' have been announced by the Bolivian Ministry of Defence. Currently, no substitute to military service exists in the country.
A conscientious objector in Bolivia, José Miguel Orías, has been recognised as a CO by a court in La Paz, provided he fulfills conditions they have stipulated. The Constitutional Court will now review the decision made in La Paz; this will likely happen within the next six months.
The Bolivian Minister of Defence has previously publicly rejected the possibility of Bolivia recoginsiing the right of conscientious objection to military service, so the Constitutional Court may mirror his opinion.
Bolivia’s ombudsperson, Waldo Albarracín, said this Thursday that if the Senate does not change a draft law on compulsory military service approved by the Chamber of Deputies he will turn to international authorities to denounce the government for human rights violations.
Albarracín, who has observed a number of bureaucratic irregularities which attempt to ‘force through’ the approval of the draft law, declared that the rules constitute a flagrant violation of human rights and children’s rights, making children of 16, 17 and 18 years ol