Choose your display style: Default (modern browsers) | Basic (older browsers) | Minimal (printing) | Large type

War Resisters' International donationDonate to WRI
WRI homepage > Programme areas > The Right to Refuse to Kill > Documentation: Conscientious objection in Turkey > This document in PDF > Campaign: Support Turkish COs

Mehmet Tarhan

Mehmet loves Bariş *
Documentation: Conscientious objection in Turkey

* "Mehmet Loves Peace/Bariş!"= A spontaneous slogan that came out from a "no war" meeting in Turkey. Anti-militarist heterosexuals use it with gays & lesbians. Peace/Baris both means "peace" and also a male name. Mehmet is a common male name and also an anonymous "soldier" name used in civilian and military arenas.

Editorial

On 8 April, early in the morning, Turkish police arrested Mehmet Tarhan, a known gay activist and conscientious objector. This is the third arrest of a conscientious objector since the release of Osman Murat Ülke from prison, and again it is not clear whether Mehmet Tarhan has been arrested "by mistake", or if this marks a change of policy.

This documentation is a collection of documents related to conscientious objection in Turkey, and has been put together by War Resisters' International in a hurry. It documents the case of Mehmet Tarhan, who is presently in prison, and the earlier cases of Mehmet Bal (arrested in October 2002) and Halil Savda (arrested on charges of desertion in November 2004). In addition, this documentation includes information on the legal framework governing military service and conscientious objection in Turkey, and looks back at the history of the Turkish antimilitarist movement.

Last but not least we include documents of international institutions which dealt with the issue of conscientious objection in Turkey.

It is presently not known if Mehmet Tarhan will share the fate of Osman Murat Ülke, who went through a vicious cycle of arrest, sentencing, and re-arrest. After 2 1/2 years in prison he was released, but is presently in a legal limbo, factually being a deserter but practically not being searched for. Mehmet Tarhan refused to be discharged on grounds of his homosexuality - which might seem as an easy way out, but Mehmet Tarhan refused to accept it, as he sees it as discrimination based on sexual orientation (and rightly so). The second arrest of Mehmet Tarhan after the trial on 9 June marks the beginning of a vicious cycle of trial, prison, release, and arrest - nobody knows for how long.

Mehmet Tarhan is only one of some fifty declared conscientious objectors in Turkey. What is happening to Mehmet Tarhan could happen to anyone of them: arrest early in the morning, transfer to the military recruitment office, and subsequently to the military unit, and then trials - who knows for how long. Not only does Turkey not recognise the right to conscientious objection, it also violates international law in trying conscientious objectors repeatedly for the same offence - a vicious cycle with an unknown end. However, only very few conscientious objectors get arrested in practice - most live quite openly - with the daily threat of being arrested at any time.

For these reasons it is important that Mehmet Tarhan and other conscientious objectors in Turkey receive our support and solidarity. It is important that the Turkish authorities have to realise that they can no longer avoid facing the issue of conscientious objection.

Otherwise, there will be more cases such as Mehmet Tarhan, Halil Savda, Mehmet Bal, and Osman Murat Ülke.

Special thanks go to Ugur Yorulmaz for providing most of the pictures used in this documentation, and keeping us updated on new developments.

Andreas Speck, 22 June 2005

This documentation has been compiled by War Resisters' International.

It can be downloaded from the WRI website (wri-irg.org), and can be freely distributed. Special thanks go to Ugur Yorulmaz, to the Quaker Council for European Affairs (QCEA), and to all others who provided the documents for this documentation.

War Resisters' International
5 Caledonian Rd, London N1 9DX, Britain
tel +44-20-7278 4040 fax +44-20-7278 0444
email concodoc@wri-irg.org http://wri-irg.org

Conscientious Objector cases

The case of conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan

TURKEY:objector Mehmet Tarhan arrested

TK14724-080405 08/04/05 19:03

Turkish conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan (TK14724) has been arrested today at 5am in the morning in a hotel in Basmane, a district of Izmir, where he went to work at a book fair. He was taken to a police station and held there until the military recruitment office opened. He was then brought to the recruitment office, and asked to sign papers to be sent to a military unit.

Mehmet Tarhan replied: "You brought me here by force. I am a conscientious objector and won't sign anything." He was subsequently asked to write a statement that he is a conscientious objector. He replied: "I will not write or sign anything. You brought me here by force and you should solve the problem you created yourself." As a result, the former protocol was extended with a supplementary protocol, stating that he refused to sign both of them. In addition, the recruitment officers called for their superiors. Three higher officers appeared on the scene. While Mehmet Tarhan was until then allowed to sit in the garden and to smoke, he was now "attached" to a recruit, who was told that his service would be nullified if Mehmet Tarhan would escape. The recruitment office also called the police, and requested a squad to guard Mehmet Tarhan. Three police were assigned to that task.

Later gendarmes (military police) were summoned to take over Mehmet Tarhan and to bring him to a military training unit in Tokat, to which he was hurriedly reassigned (he had originally been assigned to a military unit in Samsun). Mehmet Tarhan refused to cooperate, and was handcuffed and pushed into a car. It is not clear where he will be brought. Mehmet Tarhan declared that he is now on hunger strike.

War Resisters' International is concerned about the treatment of Mehmet Tarhan, and fears for his health and safety. He is at risk of physical abuse by the military police.

War Resisters' International calls for letters of protest to the Turkish authorities, and Turkish embassies abroad. Protest emails should be sent to the General Staff, email gnkur@tsk.mil.tr . A protest email can be sent at http://wri.irg.org/co/alerts/20050408a.html .

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

TURKEY:Conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan to be tried on 28 April

TK14724-150405 15/04/05 19:02

Turkish conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan will be tried in the military court of Sivas on 28 April 2005, 9:00am. As reported in an earlier co-alert on 8 April (see http://wri-irg.org/news/htdocs/20050408a.html), Mehmet Tarhan had been arrested on 8 April 2005 early in the morning. He was then brought to a military unit in Tokat, accompanied by military police. Because Mehmet Tarhan is refusing to co-operate in any way, he was then transferred to the military prison in Sivas. Mehmet Tarhan is a gay and anarchist activist. He declared his conscientious objection on 27 October 2001, and continued anti-war activities in public ever since, without going into hiding. Mehmet Tarhan is now being charged with Article 88 Turkish Military Penal Code (TACK), "Insubordination in front of the unit". This charge carries a penalty between 3 months and 5 years imprisonment.

More information and pictures of Mehmet Tarhan can be found at http://www.savaskarsitlari.org/mehmettarhan/. Most of the information is in Turkish though.

War Resisters' International calls for a continued campaign of protest letters and email to the Turkish authories, and Turkish embassies abroad. A protest email to the General Staff headquarters can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20050408a.html. Vigils and demonstrations in front of Turkish consulates and embassies can also be effective. A list of Turkish embassies abroad can be found at http://www.mfa.gov.tr/MFA/Ministry/TurkishRepresentations/searchRepresentatives.htm.

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

TURKEY: Conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan transferred to hospital by force - forcefully undressed and forced to wear uniform

TK14724-200405 20/04/05 17:24

Turkish gay conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan was today transferred to the Sivas Military Hospital by force, where he was undressed and forced to wear a military uniform. He has also been attacked by other prisoners, who had been told that "a terrorist" would be sent to the hospital. Mehmet Tarhan was t ransferred to the military hospital following an order of the General Attorney dated 19 April 2005. The hospital is asked to produce a report on his homosexuality, which the Turkish military - in contradiction to international standards - views as an illness, which would allow the military to discharge Mehmet Tarhan from military service. In his declaration of conscientious objection in 2001, Mehmet Tarhan rejected this option: "I preceive the unfit (or 'rotten') report given as a 'right' based on my homosexuality as an expression of the rotteness of the militarist system itself." Mehmet Tarhan's lawyers pointed out after a meeting with the attorney that any medical examination of Mehmet Tarhan against his will is a form of torture, and demanded that these unlawful practices be stopped immediately. It is expected that Mehmet Tarhan will be examined on Tuesday, 26 April, two days before his trial.War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan, and an immediate end to any medical examination against his will. War Resisters' International calls for Mehmet Tarhan to be treated as a conscientious objector. Any discharge for reasons of his homosexuality is a discrimination based on sexual orientation, and a violation of international human rights standards. War Resisters' International urgently calls for protest faxes to the Military Hospital in Sivas: +90-346-2253915 (Please write Hastanenin dikkatine (to the attention of the hospital) in big letters on the top)

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

TURKEY: Trial against Mehmet Tarhan adjourned. New CO arrested

TK14724-14728-280405

The trial against conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan (TK14724), who has been arrested on 8 April 2005 (see TK14724-080405 - http://wri-irg.org/news/htdocs/ 20050408a.html) has been adjourned to 26 May today. At the end of the trial, Sahin Ozbay (TK14728), who had declared his conscientious objection on 4 October 2004, was arrested. It is expected that he will be brought to the recruitment office and then transferred to "his" military unit, and will follow the fate of Mehmet Tarhan. The trial against Mehmet Tarhan has been adjourned to 26 May, so that the court can hear witness statements from 10 soldiers, who witnessed Mehmet Tarhan's "insubordination in front of his unit", according to Article 88 of the Turkish Military Penal Code (TACK). This charge carries a penalty between 3 months and 5 years imprisonment. The trial was attended by a group of Turkish supporters and conscientious objectors, and two international observers, who formed an international delegation organised by War Resisters' International. Tina Kemler from Germany and Eldad Zion from Israel reported on the arrest of Sahin Ozbay and the adjournment of the trial, and are presently discussing further action with the Turkish supporters. War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of conscientious objectors Mehmet Tarhan and Sahin Ozbay (1).

War Resisters' International calls for a continued campaign of protest letters and email to the Turkish authories, and Turkish embassies abroad. A protest email to the General Staff headquarters can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20050408a.html . Vigils and demonstrations in front of Turkish consulates and embassies can also be effective. A list of Turkish embassies abroad can be found at http://www.mfa.gov.tr/MFA/Ministry/TurkishRepresentations/ searchRepresentatives.htm.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

(1) Sahin Ozbay was released in the afternoon of the same day.

TURKEY: FEAR OF TORTURE / Conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan abused by other prisoners

TK14724-240505

War Resisters' International fears for the safety of imprisoned Turkish conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan, presently awaiting trial in the Military Prison of Sivas. As reported in an earlier co-alert on 8 April (see http://wri-irg.org/news/htdocs/ 20050408a.html), Mehmet Tarhan had been arrested on 8 April 2005 early in the morning. He was then brought to a military unit in Tokat, accompanied by military police. Because Mehmet Tarhan is refusing to co-operate in any way, he was then transferred to the military prison in Sivas. Mehmet Tarhan is a gay and anarchist activist. He declared his conscientious objection on 27 October 2001, and continued anti-war activities in public ever since, without going into hiding. Mehmet Tarhan is now being charged with Article 88 Turkish Military Penal Code (TACK), "Insubordination in front of the unit". This charge carries a penalty between 3 months and 5 years imprisonment. A first trial on 28 April 2005 was adjourned to 26 May, to call several soldiers from his unit as witnesses.

Meanwhile, Mehmet Tarhan is imprisoned in the Military Prison of Sivas, where he is facing death threats and abuse. Suna Coskun, Mehmet Tarhan's lawyer, reported on the abuse her client faces today. On arrival at the Military Prison in Sivas, staff sergeant Mustafa Selvi threatened Mehmet Tarhan with transfer to "Common Cell No 2", where the "wildest" prisoners are imprisoned. Later Mehmet Tarhan was ordered to enter "Common Cell No 1" on his own. The cell was dark, and the inmates (which Mehmet Tarhan could not see) ordered him to sit down on a chair next to the door. They started to ask questions. They wanted to know whether he was a terrorist or traiter, in which case they would kill him. Then the inmates started to beat Mehmet Tarhan, and insulted him because of his long hair. Prisoner Ertan Mertoglu showed his weapon to Mehmet Tarhan and threatened to kill him. This attacked was ended by other prisoners. Mehmet Tarhan was then transferred to the dormitory, where a few moments later the same prisoners attacked him again. The beat him everywhere and pulled on his hair. The attack turned into an act of lynching. After 20 minutes, other prisoners again stopped the attack. After the attack in Common Cell No 2, the light bulbs in the cell were tightened again, so that the normal light in the cells was made to work again. This indicates that the attack had been prepared. Later, the prisoners who beat Mehmet Tarhan came to him and told him that staff sergeant Mustafa Selvi had told them that he was a terrorist, and "you know how you have to deal with him". They said that this was the reason they beat him. Mehmet Tarhan was then transferred to a single cell, but during each time Mehmet Tarhan left the cell, the prisoners Ertan Mertoglu, Hakki Dincel, Ersoy Özbulduk, and Ercan Kizilboga threatened him. They told him: "We could have killed you on the first day if we wanted. But we still can do it." Mehmet Tarhan was fearing of his life, and therefore did not tell anyone. But then the prisoners demanded first money, and later clothes, and telephone cards. On 29 April, the prisoners Hakki Dincel, Ersoy Özbulduk, and Ertan Mertoglu demanded 500YTL (about 290 EUROs) and added he would know what to expect, if he would not pay. Mehmet Tarhan answered that he is unable to pay such an amount. One week later he submitted to the threats and handed over 300YTL to Ercan Kizilboga and Ertan Mertoglu. Then, his extortioners demanded clothers. On 9 May 2005 they demanded three black suits. To guarantee that he would deliver, they forced him to call his sister and listened during the phone conversation. On 11 May 2005, Emine Tarhan brought two black suits, shoes, ties, and shirts to the prison, which were handed over to Ertan Mertoglu by the prison authorities. Mehmet Tarhan's upper lip and the right side of his lower lip cracked as a result of these attacks. He is suffering ecchymosis at the chin, the neck, and other parts of his body. As a result of being beaten on his chest he suffered from breathing problems until 30 April. In the following days, he contiunously lost hair. Because of being beaten on his knee, legs, and feet he suffered from ecchymosis there, and for a long time had difficulties standing up.

Mehmet Tarhan informed the prison authorities about the abuse on his first day. As the report above shows, the prison authorities did do nothing to stop the abuse, and actively encouraged other prisoners to abuse Mehmet Tarhan. After her visit on 19 May, Mehmet Tarhan's lawyer Suna Coskun alerted the prison authorities, and demanded an examination of Mehmet Tarhan, and a new lock for Mehmet Tarhan's cell. On 20 May, the prison authorities recorded the abuse, and promised to ensure his safety. However, War Resisters' International and Mehmet Tarhans friends and lawyers still fear for his safety.

War Resisters' International urgently calls for letters of protest to the Turkish authorities, and Turkish embassies, demanding from the Turkish government to ensure the safety of Mehmet Tarhan. Letters should be addressed to the Turkish President, Ahmet Necdet Sezer, email cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr.

A protest email can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20050524a.html.

War Resisters' International appeals to international organisations to pressure Turkey to ensure the safety of Mehmet Tarhan.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

TURKEY: 13 arrests at trial of conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan / trial adjourned to 9 June

TK14724-14738-14739-14740-260505 26/05/05 12:13

13 antimilitarists and conscientious objectors were arrested in Sivas following the trial of conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan. The trial began early in the morning, and Mehmet Tarhan clearly showed signs of physical abuse - he had bruises all over his body, and could not walk well because of the ongoing abuse (see http://wri-irg.org/news/htdocs/20050524a.html). Mehmet Tarhan's lawyer asked for Mehmet Tarhan to be acquitted, but the judge adjourned the trial to 9 June. Presently, War Resisters' International is again considering an international delegation for the trial. After the trial, the police arrested three conscientious objectors: Erdem Yalcinkaya (TK14738) declared his conscientious objection together with Mehmet Tarhan on 27 October 2001, Mustafa Seyhoglu (TK14739) declared his conscientious objection on 24 January 2003, and Ersan Ugur Gor (TK14740) declared his conscientious objection on 15 May 2004, during the militurizm festival in Istanbul. They are presently held at the police station in Sivas, and it is feared that they will be brought to the recruitment office, and from there to their military units, and to military prison. Other activists tried to block the police, to prevent the police from pushing the arrested conscientious objectors into the police van. The police violently broke up the nonviolent blockade, and arrested ten antimilitarists under charges of "assaulting the police". These 10 antimilitarists are presently also held at Sivas Police station.

War Resisters' International is very concerned about the recent developments in Turkey. War Resisters' International calls for urgent protest faxes and emails to: General Staff of the Turkish Military: Fax +90-312-4250813 Presidency of the Turkish Republic: Fax +90-312-4271330, email cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr Sivas Military Prison: Fax +90- 346-2253915 A protest email to the Turkish President Ahmet Nezdet Secer can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20050526a.html.

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of all arrested conscientious objectors and antimilitarists.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

TURKEY: All arrested activists released / 4th CO briefly arrested

TK14724-14738-14739-14740-270505 27/05/05 12:19

During the night all activists who remained in police custody were released. The three conscientious objectors Ersan Ugur Gor, Erdem Yalcinkaya, and Mustafa Sehoglu were brought to the recruitment office, which was opened especially to deal with them. At the recruitment office their ID cards were taken, and they were told to come back in the morning, when they would be given back their ID cards. They were then released. During the night, a fourth conscientious objector, Hasan Cimen, who was sleeping in a car in front of a friends house, was briefly arrested by police. He too was brought to the recruitment office in the middle of the night, and was released with the order to report to the recruitment office in the morning. His ID card was also taken off him. Hasan Cimen declared his conscientious objection on 15 May 2000.

Mehmet Tarhan (TK14724) has been returned to the military prison after the trial, and began a hunger strike in protest against the abuse and mistreatment.

War Resisters' International is extremly concerned about these new developments.

War Resisters' International calls for urgent protest faxes and emails to: General Staff of the Turkish Military: Fax +90-312- 4250813 Presidency of the Turkish Republic: Fax +90-312- 4271330, email cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr
Sivas Military Prison: Fax +90-346-2253915 A protest email to the Turkish President Ahmet Nezdet Secer can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20050526a.html .

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of all arrested conscientious objectors and antimilitarists.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

TURKEY: Conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan released from prison - but not from the military

TK14724-100605 10/06/05 12:12

The trial session today of conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan (TK14724) in Sivas in Turkey ended with a small surprise: the military judge ordered Mehmet Tarhan, who had been arrested in Izmir on 8 April, to be released. Mehmet Tarhan, who is charged with Article 88 TACK (insubordination in front of the unit) had to be released, so the judge, because he already spent two months in prison, which is about the time he would have to serve in prison if finally sentenced. The trial itself was adjourned, but the date of the next trial session is not yet known. Mehmet Tarhan, who showed visible signs of physical weakness after suffering from abuse and threats by fellow prisoners and two weeks of hunger strike (which he started after the last trial session on 26 May, in protest against the authorities inaction following the reporting of the abuse), was transferred to the recruitment office, which decided to transfer him back to the military unit by military police. It is expected that he will be brought to Tokat today.

This means, the cycle of military order, refusal, prison and trial will start again immediately - a cycle, which is in violation of international legal standards. In the case of Turkish conscientious objector Osman Murat Ulke the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention decided in 1999 (Opinion 36/1999) that any detention of a conscientious objector after an initial detention following a first act of refusal is "arbitrary, being contrary to article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights". Given the history of abuse and illtreatment of Mehmet Tarhan during his time in the military prison in Sivas, War Resisters' International is extremely concerned that this illtreatment will resume on Mehmet Tarhans return to the prison in Sivas in the next days.

War Resisters' International calls for urgent protest faxes and emails to: General Staff of the Turkish Military: Fax +90-312- 4250813 Presidency of the Turkish Republic: Fax +90-312- 4271330, email cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr
Sivas Military Prison: Fax +90-346-2253915 A protest email to the Turkish President Ahmet Nezdet Secer can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20050526a.html .

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan and all other imprisoned conscientious objectors.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

TURKEY: Update on conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan

TK14724-160605 16/06/05 12:32

Turkish conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan (see previous alerts at http://wri-irg.org/co/turkcampaign-en.htm) has been returned to the military prison in Sivas following his "release" from military prison on 9 June. To summarise the events: At the trial session on 9 June, the military judge ordered Mehmet Tarhan, who had been arrested in Izmir on 8 April, to be released.

Mehmet Tarhan, who is charged with Article 88 TACK (insubordination in front of the unit) had to be released, so the judge, because he already spent two months in prison, which is about the time he would have to serve in prison if finally sentenced. The trial itself was adjourned, but the date of the next trial session is not yet known. Mehmet Tarhan, who showed visible signs of physical weakness after suffering from abuse and threats by fellow prisoners and two weeks of hunger strike (which he started at the previous trial session on 25 May, in protest against the authorities' inaction following the reporting of the abuse), was transferred to the recruitment office. A decision to transfer him back to the military unit in Tokat was made by ASAL, the Central Office for Recruitment in Ankara, and Mehmet Tarhan was sent to Tokat on 10 June. He spent the weekend at the military unit, and was transferred back to Sivas on 13 June, where he spent one night at the military hospital, and was then sent back to the military prison in Sivas. This is not only a violation of the human right to conscientious objection, but also a violation of Article 14 paragraph 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): “No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure.”

In 1999, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention already ruled against Turkey in the case of conscientious objector Osman Murat Ülke that every detention following an initial detention is arbitrary, and called on the Government “to take necessary steps to remedy the situation so as to bring it into line with the principles set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” (Opinion 36/1999) That the Turkish authorities, 6 years later, again ignore these basic principles of human rights highlights their ignorance of human rights.

Mehmet Tarhan is still on hunger strike, demanding his safety in prison and a treatment equal to other prisoners - for example, he receives letters late or sometimes not at all. He is now in the third week of his hunger strike.

War Resisters' International calls for letters of support to Mehmet Tarhan.
Mehmet Tarhan
5. Piyade Egitim Tugayi
Askeri Cezaevi
Temeltepe - Sivas
Turkey

War Resisters' International calls for urgent protest faxes and emails to:

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan and all other imprisoned conscientious objectors.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

TURKEY: Update on Conscientious Objector Mehmet Tarhan / hunger strike ended

TK14724-220605

Turkish Conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan, imprisoned at the military prison in Sivas, ended his hunger strike in the morning of 21 June 2005. He began the hunger strike on 25 May 2005, in protest against maltreatment in the prison and the inaction of the prison authorities to protect him. After 28 days of hunger strike, the prison authorities accepted his demands. Mehmet Tarhan said in a press statement, made with the help of his lawyer Suna Coskun, that he had chosen to end his hunger strike after the prison management had chosen to accept his conditions. After his release from prison on 9 June, Mehmet Tarhan was returned to the military unit in Tokat, and then back to the military prison in Sivas (see the last update from 16 June: http://wri-irg.org/news/htdocs/20050616a.html).

The prison authorities accepted Mehmet Tarhan's demands for equal treatment. As he is in a cell of his own (to protect him from abuse by other prisoners), he is given a TV, is able to make his own tea, has access to books and should receive his mail regulary. Yesterday, the prison authorities accepted his demand for an examination by civilian physicians, and yesterday morning to physicians from the Medical Association of Sivas examined Mehmet Tarhan in prison, and declared him of good health. The necessary treatment after the end of 28 days of hunger strike has begun.

In a separate development, the lawyers have been informed that the first hearing in the case of his second refusal to obey orders (after his "release" from military prison on 9 June) will be on 12 July at the Military Court of Sivas.

This is not only a violation of the human right to conscientious objection, but also a violation of Article 14 paragraph 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): “No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure.” In 1999, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention already ruled against Turkey in the case of conscientious objector Osman Murat Ülke that every detention following an initial detention is arbitrary, and called on the Government “to take necessary steps to remedy the situation so as to bring it into line with the principles set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” (Opinion 36/1999) That the Turkish authorities, 6 years later, again ignore these basic principles of human rights highlights their ignorance of human rights.

War Resisters' International calls for letters of support to Mehmet Tarhan.
Mehmet Tarhan
5. Piyade Egitim Tugayi
Askeri Cezaevi
Temeltepe - Sivas
Turkey

War Resisters' International calls for urgent protest faxes and emails to:

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan and all other imprisoned conscientious objectors.

Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International

Statement on the trial of conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan

Istanbul, 11 June 2005

I came to Turkey as part of an international delegation to observer the trial against conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan in Sivas, on 9 June 2005. This was the second delegation organised by War Resisters' International, an international network with 80 affiliated organisations in 40 countries, since the arrest of Mehmet Tarhan on 8 April 2005, and the start of his trial for “insubordination in front of his unit” on 28 April 2005.

  1. Mehmet Tarhan exercises his right to conscientious objection, as derived from Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Turkey is a party. The fact that Turkey did not introduce any national legislation to implement this right does not nullify Mehmet Tarhan's human right to conscientious objection -- it merely highlights the Turkish governments attitude towards human rights.
  2. While in prison, Mehmet Tarhan was subjected to illtreatment and abuse from other prisoners, orchestrated by or at least tolerated by the prison authorities. The failure of the authorities to act on this immediately is of grave concern, and is a neglect of the authorities' responsibility towards persons in custody. On 26 May, Mehmet Tarhan began a hunger strike against the authorities failure to fulfil their responsibility to protect Mehmet Tarhan from abuse and illtreatment.
  3. Although the court ordered Mehmet Tarhan's release from military prison on 9 June, the military authorities responded to this only be transferring him again to his military unit in Tokat, where the cycle of military order, refusal, and imprisonment will begin again. Within a few days, Mehmet Tarhan will be back in the military prison in Sivas, and a second trial will be opened. This is not only a violation of the human right to conscientious objection, but also a violation of Article 14 paragraph 7 of the ICCPR: “No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure.” In 1999, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention already ruled against Turkey in the case of conscientious objector Osman Murat Ülke that every detention following an initial detention is arbitrary, and called on the Government “to take necessary steps to remedy the situation so as to bring it into line with the principles set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” (Opinion 36/1999) That the Turkish authorities, 6 years later, again ignore these basic principles of human rights highlights their ignorance of human rights.
  4. War Resisters' International will continue to work with Mehmet Tarhan's Turkish supporters, and with other European and international organisations, to highlight the situation of Mehmet Tarhan, and to fight for his release from prison and from the military. We will especially raise these issues with the relevant bodies of the European Union, to highlight Turkey policy of “doublespeak” on human rights, and to make sure that the treatment of conscientious objectors is an issue in the talks about Turkey's EU membership.
  5. In the present situation, only the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan from prison and from the military can be seen as in line with Turkey's commitment to international human rights standards. War Resisters' International therefore demands the immediate and unconditional release of Mehmet Tarhan.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International
Istanbul, 11 June 2005

Mehmet Tarhan: declaration of conscientious objection

On 27 October 2001, two antimilitarists from Ankara, Mehmet Tarhan and Erdem Yalç0nkaya, declared their conscientious objection (to compulsory military service) at a press conference held at the Human Rights Association (IHD). The libertarian gay&lesbian group "Kaos GL", the "Initiative against War and Domination" from Istanbul and the IHD also declared their support for conscientious objection at the same venue.

A few hours later a group of (approximately 25) anarchists walked through the city center of Ankara, holding banners and chanting slogans. The unauthorized demonstration continued with the pronouncement of the groups' anti-war manifesto and ended without any detention or police intervention.

CO declaration of Mehmet Tarhan

The bombs that were thrown on the Afghan people just yesterday and will be thrown on the Iraqi people tomorrow are deceptively associated with the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers on September 11 and killed thousands, and with the armament of Iraq. Thereby the whole world is expected to join in these attacks. I curse every kind of violence and believe that joining or condoning violence will only result in new violent incidents and will make everybody complicit responsible for the subsequent traumas. I think that wars caused by power mongering states are first and foremost a violation of the right to live. The violation of the right to live is a crime against humanity and no international convention or law can justify this crime, regardless of any rationale. I therefore declare that I won't be an agent of such crime under any circumstances. I will not serve any military apparatus.

I long for a humanity, which has left power scheming behind, has abandoned borders, is nonviolent, and lives in harmony with nature. The practical absence of such an existence does not necessitate dropping my struggle to promote it.

I don't believe in the necessity of the institution called the state and I don't feel loyalty to any state.

The state that claims me as its citizen wants to recruit me for its own sake, to turn me into a death machine, and to make me complicit in the crime against humanity that I have just discussed..

I won't let this happen and will preserve my beliefs.

The report that classifies me as 'unfit' (or 'rotten') because I am gay and affords me the 'right' to exemption from military service is nothing more than a sign of the rottenness of the state itself.

As an individual I am determined not to serve any kind of military or other apparatus of any state. I would perceive it as an insult to myself and to humanity to offer an 'excuse' for not serving in the military and refuse therefore any state permission for adjournment or exemption.

In short, I totally refuse to serve in the military. And I appeal to everybody: Refuse military service; don't go through any bureaucratic process regarding draft and military service, refuse control mechanism of the state such as MERNIS1 and tax IDs, act in solidarity through nonviolent means.

The way to stop war is to deprive it from its human resources.

Any kind of violence is a crime against humanity.

Mehmet Tarhan

Timeline of the Mehmet Tarhan case

October 27, 2001
Mehmet Tarhan, declared his conscientious/total objection in the Ankara branch of IHD (Human Rights Association).
February 16, 2005
An investigation was opened on Mehmet and two of our other friends who read press releases at the "Conscientous Objectors/Total Objectors Rice Day" held on September 5, 2004 in front of Ankara Sİhhiye Military Base. Mehmet refused to supply a deposition.
April 8, 2005
The night he went from İstanbul to Izmir to work at the book fair in that city, he was arrested by the police on the grounds that he was a "roll call deserter" and was handed over to a military service processing office. Here, he declared that he is a conscientous/total objector, he refused to give any statement or sign any documents.
April 9, 2005
He was transferred to Tokat in the custody of soldiers. He was sent off from the bus station by a group of twenty anarchists and antimilitarists, who chanted "the greatest objector is our objector" [as opposed to "the greatest soldier is our soldier," a slogan used when people are sent off to military service in Turkey] and "Mehmet loves peace," amidst the confusion of onlookers.
April 10, 2005
He was handed over to the military unit in Tokat. He refused wearing a uniform, getting his hair cut and shaving his beard and moustache. He did not sign documents regarding military service.
On the same day, the press releases in Istanbul and İzmir (at the site of the book fair) announced that Mehmet Tarhan Solidarity Initiative was formed, that Mehmet is not alone, that his resistance is supported and that a long term campaign has begun.
The War Resisters' International (WRI) announced via a press release that they are following up on this process and called for a support campaign.
April 11, 2005
Mehmet was arrested in Tokat on the charges of "insisting to disobey orders" and was transferred to Sivas Military Prison. When he was first brought to prison, he was beaten by a group of prisoners who were provoked by prison authorities.
April 14, 2005
Kaos GL (an LGBT advocacy organization) announced a written declaration and made a call to everyone to support Mehmet Tarhan.
April 16, 2005
A 40-50 strong group marched from Taksim to Galatasaray with the "Don't go to military" banner and made a press release, demanding the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan and stressing that conscientious/total objection is a right. After the press release, the group sent solidarity letters to Mehmet from the Galatasaray post office.
April 18, 2005
The date of the trial was announced. Solidarity initiatives, declared that they were going to be in Sivas on April 28, and called everyone to action on the same day.
April 21, 2005
Mehmet was forcefully taken to the Military Hospital although he had declared many times that despite being gay he would not accept the "unfit"[the word is "rotten" in Turkish] report that the military offers as a so-called "right" and stated that this report reflects the "rottenness" of the militaristic system itself. Mehmet Tarhan Solidarity Initiative condemned the forced hospital stay with a press release and called for the immediate ceasure of this torture.
April 25, 2005
At the press release organized in Izmir, a call was made to attend the trial on April 28 and a letter of support was mailed to Mehmet.
During the march that began at Beþiktaþ ferry station and ended at Moda, flyers were distributed both in Beþiktaþ and Kadİköy, a call for Mehmet's immediate release was made and people were invited to attend Mehmet's trial. İn additon to slogans, the march was also accompanied by a large portrait of Mehmet and a banner that read "Mehmet was bored, we are taking him for a walk."
The Association of Conscientous Objectors who rallied in front of the Turkish Consulate in Athens, called for the immediate release of Mehmet and the recognition of the right to conscientious objection.
April 28, 2005
Mehmet was tried with the charges of "insisting to disobey orders in order to escape military service." While the group consisting of 30 people from solidarity initiatives and international supporters, were there to attend the trial, some of the supporters were not allowed in the court room. As Mehmet repeated that he is a conscientous objector and that it is against law for him to be sued in a military court, his lawyers asserted that he is a civilian and a conscientous objector, that a civilian cannot be tried with disobeying orders and that conscientous objection is recognized as a right in international conventions.
The trial was adjourned to May 26 in order to listen to the testimony of 7 soldiers, and the imprisonement of Mehmet was continued. After the trial, a conscientous objector was taken in custody on the grounds of being a "roll call deserter" and was released the same day.
April 30, 2005
A press release was organized in Istanbul with the attendance of Mehmet's lawyer and international supporters. The press release evaluated the latest developments in Mehmet's case and the trial result.
May 1, 2005
In the May 1st rallies organized in Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, Antalya and Malatya, banners about Mehmet were carried, flyers were distributed and slogans were chanted.
May 15, 2005
Mehmet Tarhan was one of main topics of the II. Traditional Militourism Festival held in Izmir. His resistance was supported with the slogans chanted and statements made at each stop. Before the new declarations of objection, Mehmet's support message from prison was read out. A giant letter was prepared and mailed to Mehmet.
Feminists from Ankara, made a written declaration calling all out to support Mehmet Tarhan.
May 24, 2005
Mehmet experienced intense repression and violence from the moment he sat foot in prison. The previously unknown scale of the repression Mehmet was going through was announced via the press release organized by his lawyers in Ankara.
May 25, 2005
Mehmet's hair and beard were forcefully shaved with the prosecutor's order. Mehmet went on hunger strike to protest the violence he was subjected to in prison.
A press release was organized in Istanbul to protest the violence Mehmet was subjected to. After the press release, a banner that read "Free Mehmet Tarhan" was set on air with balloons. And it was announced again that the supporters would be in Sivas for the second trial.
May 26, 2005
The second trial was held. Again 30 people from the solidarity initiatives attended the trial. Because of the violence he was subjected to, Mehmet had difficulty walking, sitting and talking. For the testimonies of the soldiers to be completed, the trial was adjourned to June 9, 2005 and it was decided that Mehmet's imprisonement continue.
After the trial, the police tried to take three conscientous/total objectors in custody on the grounds that they were "deserters." The police attacked the group who put on a nonviolent resistance against their friends' arrest. After the scuffle, the police arrested 7 more people who went to the police station to see about their friends' condition. The group was first sent to the prosecutor and then to the court room with arrest warrants. The 7 people were released to be tried without arrest while the three objectors were taken to the military service processing office. The IDs of the objectors were confiscated and they were asked to show next day with photographs. Another objector was taken in custody that night and taken to the military processing office. He too was asked to show next morning at the office. The group left for Ankara in the early hours of the morning.
15 members of the European Parliament began a signature campaign demanding the release of Mehmet Tarhan, and the recognition of his right to conscientious objection granted by international conventions.
May 27, 2005
Mehmet was not sent to the forensic lab that he needs to be sent in order to document the torture he suffered, instead he was given a mock medical examination at the military hospital.
The Istanbul branch of Human Rights Association organized a press release in Galatasaray, demanding an end to the repression Mehmet Tarhan suffers and the recognition of this right to conscientous objection. After the press release, letters were sent to the Head of Chiefs of Staff and Sivas Military Prison.
DEH (Revolutionary Gay Movement) published a statement announcing their support of Mehmet's resistance and asserted that he is not alone.
May 28, 2005
100 people strong group that gathered in Taksim Square, marched to Harbiye Military Base accompanied by banners, slogans and music. During the march, they distributed flyers that call for Mehmet's immediate release and an end to the torture he is suffering. After the press release in front of the military base, the group marched back to Taksim on the same track.
The Kurdish-Turkish War Resisters Initiative (KTSKİ) and the German Peace Organization- United Conscientious Objectors(DFK-VK) organized a rally in Frankfurt in support of conscientous objector Mehmet Tarhan currently held in Sivas Military Prison.
In the rally calling for the closure of the Incirlik air base in Adana, Turkey, a group of antimilitarists carried banners that called for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan and distributed flyers that included the last developments and called for public awareness.
May 30, 2005
According to the latest information from the prison, Mehmet's exercise time was reduced to 5 minutes.
Ankara Mehmet Tarhan Solidarity Initiative, organized a press release in Ankara with 60 participants, relaying information regarding Mehmet and calling for his immediate release.
The Solidarity Initiative gathered in front of the Taksim subway station, and amidst music and slogans, distributed fried sweet dough to passers-bye, saying "we're distributing the bites that wouldn't go through Mehmet's throat," in order to stress Mehmet's hunger strike. After dsitributing the fried dough, two members of the initiative had their heads shaved, to send to the locks of hair to the prosecutor who forcefully cut Mehmet's hair.
Lambda-İstanbul Gay Initiative, made a written statement calling all to support Mehmet Tarhan.
ÖDP [Freedom and Solidarity Party] made a press release, demanding for the legal adjustments to be made in Turkey towards the recognition of the right to conscientious objection, for Mehmet's security to be guaranteed and his immediate release..
World Tribunal on Iraq (WTI) suggested to dedicate a seat to Mehmet Tarhan on the 'Jury of Conscience' for the final Istanbul session of the tribunal on June 23-27.
June 6, 2005
The military prison in Sivas limits the visiting time of Mehmet Tarhan's lawyers to 20 minutes per day. On the protest of the lawyers, the military authorities give as reason that they cannot provide meeting facilities, and long meetings between Mehmet Tarhan and his lawyers would prevent other prisoners from using the facilities...
June 9, 2005
Third session in Mehmet Tarhan's trial for "insubordination in front of his unit". The judge orders Mehmet Tarhan to be released. Mehmet Tarhan is released from prison and transferred to the recruitment office in Sivas. The recruitment office receives an order from the Central Office for Recruitment in Ankara to transfer Mehmet Tarhan back to his unit in Tokat.
June 10, 2005
Mehmet Tarhan is transferred to the military unit in Tokat.
June 13, 2005
Mehmet Tarhan is transferred back to the military prison in Sivas. He spents one night at the military hospital in Sivas, before being transferred to the prison.
June 21, 2005
Mehmet Tarhan ends his hunger strike after 28 days.

Open letter of members of the European Parliament 25 May 2005

To the Turkish President, AHMET NECDET SEZER,
the Prime Minister RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN,
the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Deputy Prime Minister ABDULLAH GÜL,
the Minister of Justice CEMİL ÇİÇEK,
the Minister of National Defense VECDİ GÖNÜL,
the Minister of the Interior ABDULKADİR AKSU

We, the undersigning Members of the European Parliament, hereby express our deepest concern on the case of Mehmet Tarhan who is denied his right to conscientious objection, deriving from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Mehmet Tarhan declared his conscientious objection on 27 October 2001 and continued anti-war activities in public ever since, without going into hiding. Therefore he is charged with „Insubordination in front of the unit“. According to Article 88 Turkish Military Penal Code (TACK), he is facing a penalty between 3 months and 5 years imprisonment.

He was arrested on 8 April and until now is imprisoned in the Military Prison of Sivas where he is facing death threats, severe abuse and blackmail attempts by other prisoners, those encouraged and supported by prison guards. Prison authorities did not react on Mehmet Tarhans complaints. Only when his lawyer Suna Coskun demanded an examination, they would record the abuse. But still Mehmet Tarhan is target of threats and assaults.

Further on he was transferred forcibly to a military hospital where he was by violence undressed and forced to wear a uniform. Due to the repeated and grave mistreatment, Mehmet Tarhan suffers from several health problems.

The first trial on 28 April 2005 was attended by an international delegation. The trial was adjourned to 26 May, to call several soldiers from his unit as witnesses.

We, the undersigning Members of the European Parliament, call for the immediate release of Mehmet Tarhan and for the exemption of Mehmet Tarhan from military service. As long as he is imprisoned, we fear for his health, and call on you to ensure that he won't be mistreated.

The arrest of Mehmet Tarhan, the abuse in the military prison and the charge against him are violations of the human right to conscientious objection, the human right on freedom of movement and the human right on freedom from cruel and inhuman treatment according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

We also demand for the constitutional recognition of the right to conscientious objection. Conscientious objection is a human right, deriving from Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Turkey is a signatory.

Therefore we urge you to exert your influence and to take appropriate action towards the release of Mehmet Tarhan as well as of all imprisoned conscientious objectors and towards the recognition of the right to conscientious objection.

Signatures: Adamos Adamou (MEP), Vittorio Agnoletto (MEP), Paulo Casaca (MEP), Richard Falbr (MEP), Helmuth Markov (MEP), Erik Meijer (MEP), Luisa Morgantini (MEP),Roberto Musacchio (MEP), Dimitris Papadimoulis (MEP), Tobias Pflueger (MEP), Miguel Portas (MEP), Miloslav Ransdorf (MEP), Heide Ruehle (MEP), Eva-Britt Svensson (MEP), Kyriacos Triantaphyllides (MEP), Sahra Wagenknecht (MEP), Gabi Zimmer (MEP)

http://tobiaspflueger.twoday.net/stories/718884/

from Dr. Caroline Lucas, Green Party Member of the European Parliament for the South East of England

Commissioner Olli Rehn
Commissioner for Enlargement
European Commission
Rue de la Loi, 200
Bruxelles 1049

9th June 2005

Dear Commissioner,

Re: Turkish conscientious objector

I am writing to bring to your attention the case of Mr. Mehmet Tarhan, a gay man and conscientious objector, who has been detained since 8 April in the military prison of Sivas, Turkey. Mehmet Tarhan declared his conscientious objection on 27 October 2001 and has continued anti- war activities in public ever since, without going into hiding. Therefore, he is charged with "Insubordination in front of the unit". According to Article 88 Turkish Military Penal Code (TACK), he is facing a penalty between 3 months and 5 years imprisonment.

In prison, he has received death threats, severe abuse and blackmail attempts by other prisoners, often encouraged by prison guards. Prison authorities did not respond to Mehmet Tarhan’s complaints: only when his lawyer Suna Coskun demanded an examination did they even record allegations of abuse. Due to this repeated and grave mistreatment, Mehmet Tarhan now suffers from several health problems.

The arrest of Mehmet Tarhan, his abuse in the military prison and the charges against him are violations of his human rights to conscientious objection, freedom of movement and freedom from cruel and inhuman treatment, as guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Today, on the day his trial is being held, I would like to remind you that adhering to international human rights instruments remains a condition of Turkey’s accession to the EU, and that the case of Mehmet Tarhan demonstrates that Turkey is yet to reach an acceptable level of compliance with international standards.

I trust you will raise this case with the relevant Turkish authorities and seek their guarantee that, in future, all conscientious objectors will be afforded their human rights as guaranteed in international law.

I look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely,
Dr. Caroline Lucas
Green Party MEP for South East England

From Stephen Funk, US conscientious objector

June 10th 2005

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing in deepest support and solidarity of Mehmet Tarhan, who has been held in custody since April 8th in the military prison of Sivas. It has been brought to my attention, as well as to the attention of countless people around the world, that Mr. Tarhan has been detained in deplorable and inexcusable manner and action. Specifically I am referring to the vicious acts of brutality carried out by other prisoners but ultimately brought on with the encouragement and allowance of prison guards who incited the violence by telling prisoners he was "a terrorist".

As Mehmet Tarhan's trial is underway the entire process will be scrutinized by people around the world. If justice were truly to be served Mr. Tarhan would not even be facing trial, but as it is those who have carried out and encouraged violence against him must be held accountable. Anything less would be outrageous and irresponsible.

As a conscientious objector and a gay man who served a 6-month prison sentence in military prison for publicly refusing to participate whatsoever in the war, I have an especially strong connection with what Mehmet is going through. Although my situation was not justified or ideal I certainly was not put through what he has been put through, and he has not even been convicted. Unless his trial results in immediate release from prison, complete recognition of his conscientious objector status, and total discharge from military duty, thousands will rally against the injustice that has been served.

When I was serving my prison sentence I received thousands of letters of support from around the world including letters from Turkey. If Mehmet is unjustly sent to prison after his trial, he too will receive worldwide support and his safety will be of the utmost concern. To him and to those who surround him I offer this quote by Martin Luther King Jr;

"Cowardice asks the question - is it safe?
Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
Vanity asks the question - is it popular?
But conscience asks the question - is it right?
And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it because it is right."

Mehmet Tarhan has already taken the position that is right, now it is up to you to decide whether or not to do so as well.

In Peace,
Stephen Funk

Amnesty International: Conscientious objector subjected to ill-treatment and death threats from fellow inmates - Public Appeal

Amnesty International is concerned for the safety of conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan who has been subjected to death threats and beatings by other prisoners since his imprisonment on 11 April and the delay in ensuring his safety by the prison authorities after the abuses were reported.

Mehmet Tarhan was detained in Izmir on 8 April 2005 and then imprisoned in the military prison in Sivas on 11 April where he has remained since then. He has been subjected to severe beatings and death threats by other prisoners since his imprisonment there. When Mehmet Tarhan informed prison authorities of the abuse no immediate action was taken to ensure his safety and the abuse reportedly continued. After his lawyer learned about the abuse, she raised her concerns for his safety with the prison administration and an investigation into the alleged abuse was opened and some action was then taken by the prison authorities to protect him.

On 27 October 2001, Mehmet Tarhan had publicly declared his conscientious objection to compulsory military service at a press conference in Ankara. He stated:

"I condemn every kind of violence believe that joining or condoning violence will only result in new violence and everyone will be responsible for the consequences. I think that wars caused by power-mongering states are first and foremost a violation of the right to life. The violation of the right to life is a crime against humanity and no international convention or law can justify this crime, regardless of any rationale. I therefore declare that I won't be an agent of such crime under any circumstances. I will not serve any military apparatus." Since then he remained active in his anti-militarist activities. On 27 October 2004 he again publicly declared his conscientious objection.

A case was opened against Mehmet Tarhan and he is being charged with "insubordination", according to Article 88 of the Turkish Military Penal Code (TACK). This charge carries a penalty of between three months' and five years' imprisonment. The last hearing took place on 26 May and observers noted that there were signs of bruising on Mehmet Tarhan's body and that he was unable to walk properly. The next hearing has been adjourned until 9 June. Amnesty International considers Mehmet Tarhan to be a prisoner of conscience, prosecuted for his conscientiously-held beliefs, and calls for his immediate release. The organization also urges the Turkish authorities to introduce an alternative civilian service for conscientious objectors which is not discriminatory or punitive.

Background information:

In Turkey it is compulsory for all men between the ages of 19 and 40 to do military service for 15 months. (...) In recent years in Turkey there have been a small number of conscientious objectors who have publicly stated their refusal to carry out military service. They are usually subject to criminal prosecution.

Recommended action:

Please send politely worded letters to the Turkish authorities in English or your own language:

AI Index: EUR 44/022/2005 8 June 2005

Freedom for Conscientious/Total Objector Mehmet Tarhan!

April 17, 2005

Mehmet Tahran, a gay and a conscientious/total objector in Turkey, was taken into custody by police on April 8, 2005, in Izmir where he went to work in a book fair. He was handed over to the recruiting office and then to a gendarmarie outpost. Because he continues his disobedience, he is now being kept in a cell in a military prison.

Mehmet Tahran is a gay and an anarchist, who declared his conscientious objection on October 27, 2001 in the Ankara Human Rights Association. "War is a crime against humanity. I am therefore determined not to support any kind of war and to strive for the removal of all causes of war." Since then, without hiding himself or his address, he has continued his civil disobedience against war and militarism. We are extremely concerned that Mehmet Tahran, who has previously declared that he would never serve the war-machine, including the compulsory military service, was taken into custody and has since been kept in a cell during such a tense period when racist and ultra-nationalist discourses are on the rise in Turkey.

Military Service in Turkey

There is compulsory military service in Turkey.

There is no right for conscientious objection. Because the objectors refuse to perform compulsory military service, their civil resistance is responded to with arrest and imprisonment. The Turkish Armed Forces see homosexuality as a disorder, removing gay officers from their officers and preparing reports on gay soldiers. Homosexuals who are labeled by a report entitled "Psycho- Sexual Disorder: Homosexuality" are subject to spiritual and material discrimination and their rights in social and professional life are violated. Among all NATO countries, only Turkey's army sees homosexuality as a disorder. In Turkey, anarchists and Jehovah 's Witnesses refuse to be recruited.

Militarist Culture in Turkey

There has always been sexism and homophobia in Turkey, a country with an all-pervading culture of masculinity and soldiery.

Militarist organizations have always looked down on homosexuals, especially when it's about military service, labeled them with filing systems, making their life unbearable. Military organization is defined as a state of grace, which a homosexual can never reach.

The fact that military institutions, as the fortresses of masculinity and militarism, exclude women and homosexual men, does not mean they cannot fight, or manage to be soldiers. The exclusion of women and homosexual men is a result of the ideology of masculinity. This ideology, and the military, one of the strongest institutions backing it, degrades the homosexual individual, attacks his soul and personality because they see homosexuals as nothing but "faggots". Curse and despise.

Military psychiatry in Turkey provides a scientific basis for such an ideological approach to militarism. Military psychiatry in Turkey still refers to DSM II of the American Psychiatric Association.

Thus, contrary to contemporary psychiatric literature, according to the military psychiatrist, homosexuality is a psycho-sexual pathology, Those who have this "pathologhy" will not be permitted to join the army, even when they wish to. If one is discovered to be a homosexual after his recruitment, the same approach applies. This time, the law of "unnatural sexual relations " is applicable.

Under this law, not only a soldier who has homosexual relations is discharged from the Turkish armed forces, but also the definition of this relationship is charged as being "unnatural"! Nevertheless, the actual circumstances do not always conform to written rules. Those joining the army by hiding their homosexuality and those who are not gay but engage in same-sex intercourse in the army, are facts of life.

There are three approaches to these facts. To overlook, to neglect for the sake of protecting the honor of the unit, to exile these people to separate places, and label and discharge those defining themselves as homosexual. Of these approaches, which is to be taken depends on the situation, the location and the officers involved.

Freedom for Mehmet Tahran!

Gay and conscientious objector Mehmet Tahran has made clear in his public declaration that he would not by-pass the "conscription problem" through means of a "disabled" report that military psychiatrists would offer him because of his homosexuality.

Conscientious objection should be a human right ! Stop custodies against conscientious objectors and free the objectors who are being held in military prison cells!

PRESS STATEMENT BY KAOS GL

Source: http://www.kaosgl.com/news/fullnews.php?id=43

The case of conscientious objector Halil Savda

Halil Savda has a complex story. He spent several years in prison, sentenced on charges of "supporting an illegal organisation".

He has been released on 28 December 2004, and is now living with his family, although he is supposed to be in the military.

TURKEY:Conscientious objector Halil Savda arrested / fear or torture TR14682-161204 16/12/04 17:18

War Resisters' International learned today that conscientious objector Halil Savda is presently held at the military unit in Corlu-Tekirdag for "insisting on disobedience". War Resisters' International fears for his wellbeing, and believes that he is in danger of illtreatment and torture. Halil Savda was born in Sirnak/Cizre in 1974, and graduated from primary school. In 1993, he was arrested and held for 1 month in Sirnak/Cizre, during which time he was tortured repeatedly. The State Security Court then charged him with "supporting an illegal organisation (the PKK - Kurdish Workers Party)". He was then sent to prison, and released in 1996. Upon release from prison, he was called up for military service.

He first went to his military unit for basic training, but he did not report to "his" unit after his transfer at the end of basic training.

In 1997, he was again arrested, and the State Security Court charged him with "membership in an illegal organisation (PKK)".

The Adana State Security Court sentenced him to 15 years in prison.

Following a change in the Turkish Penal Code, he was released from prison on 18 November 2004, and was sent handcuffed from prison to Antep Gendarmerie Station because of his desertion from military service. The he was held for six days in a cell without a bed, only with a few blankets. The Army Officers did not allow him to see his family, and he was held in isolation for the six days. On 25 November, he was transferred to "his" military unit in Corlu-Tekirdag. There he declared that because of the torture he had to endure in 1993, he cannot serve as a soldier. In a letter to the Commander he declared himself a conscientious objector, and demands that Turkey finally recognises the right to conscientious objection. On 16 December, he was questioned at the Corlu Military Court. He was then formally arrested for "insisting on disobedience" and transferred from the military unit to Corlu Military Prison.

War Resisters' International believes that he is in acute danger of being mistreated or tortured. War Resisters' International therefore calls for protest phone calls to Corlu Military Prison (+90-282-6611781), pointing to the prohibition of torture and the right to conscientious objection. In addition War Resisters' International calls for protest emails to the General Staff, email gnkur@tsk.mil.tr . A protest email can be sent at http://wri-irg.org/co/alerts/20041216c.html .

War Resisters' International also calls for letters of support to Halil Savda.

Halil Savda
5. Kolordu
2. Askeri Cezaevi Bölügü
Corlu/Tekirdag
Turkey

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Halil Savda and all other imprisoned conscientious objectors.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

The case of conscientious objector Mehmet Bal

Mehmet Bal met Osman Murat Ülke in prison, and turned from someone who committed a murder into a conscientious objector.

He was the first conscientious objector to be arrested after the release of Osman Murat Ülke, and was temporarily discharged for medical reasons. He too is presently in a legal limbo, and can be re-arrested at any time.

TURKEY: Conscientious objector arrested

TK12718-251002 25/10/02 17:32

Turkish conscientious objector Mehment Bal presented himself to the army on Thursday, and was arrested immediately.

Today he was transferred to the military prison in Adana. War Resisters' International is concerned about his safety, and therefore calls for protest faxes to the military prison in Adana.

Adana 6. Kolordu Askeri Cezaevi
Adana, Turkey
Tel. +90-322-322 83 67
Fax: +90-322-322 81 36

Mehmet Bal is a unique case of a conscientious objector, and probably many will feel uncomfortable about this case. Osman Murat Ülke, Turkey's first conscientious objector who spent 2 1/2 years in prison from 1996-1999, met him in the Military Prison of Eskisehir. He wrote about him in a letter published in Peace News December 1999-February 2002 (in which he called him Ahmet).

In this letter he describes the circumstances in his prison cell, which was lead by Ahmet. Osman Murat Ülke first encountered a boycott against him, but was released soon. He returned to the same cell soon, after being rearrested because of his conscientious objection. He writes: "This time my roommates were quite surprised, because they saw that my stay was not a coincidence. They realised that I was serious about conscientious objection and that I chose to be there. Ahmet had difficulty accepting this and so he started discussing this with me. After a while we came to the point of living peacefully together. "Although our thoughts were in conflict, he began to respect me, followed by a kind of friendship. Observing my behaviour in prison, Ahmet tried more and more to understand my principles. So we began to discuss, in a more relaxed way, ethics, religion, anthropology, history, nationalism, psychology and so on. He was reading the books my friends brought me and one day one of these books acted like an explosion inside him. "After nearly two years of knowing each other, his rate of change gets faster and faster.

..." Mehmet Bal (alias Ahmet) was imprisoned because of murder, and at the time Osman Murat Ülke met him in prison, he was a fascist. In March 1999 he was sentenced to lifetime imprisonment.

Osman Murat Ülke describes his process of change above. About 4 month ago an amnesty granted by the Turkish constitutional court lead to his release, and he was immediately ordered to report to his military unit in Mersin. He went there and refused to bear arms. He then was allowed to serve in the library of the barracks. Four weeks ago he was granted holidays. During this time he decided not to continue to serve - even in the library - but to declare his conscientious objection to military service.

War Resisters' International calls for support letters to Mehmet Bal:

Mehmet Bal
Adana 6. Kolordu Askeri Cezaevi
Adana, Turkey

War Resisters' International calls for protest letters to the Turkish authorities, especially the Military Prison in Adana, and Turkish embassies abroad. Please mention that you are concerned about Mehmet Bal's safety.

War Resisters' International calls for the immediate release of Mehmet Bal.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

TURKEY:Conscientious objector Mehmet Bal arrested again

TK12718-230103 23/01/03 15:01

Turkish conscientious objector Mehmet Bal was arrested again yesterday. Three officers of JITEM, the secrect service of the Turkish gendarmie, visited the place where he was staying, and demanded that he followed them. It could be observed that they left the house, and met a police van parked around the corner. There they had a discussion with the police, which didn't want to arrest Mehmet Bal. For a couple of hours his whereabouts were unknown - something even more worrying as JITEM is known for torture and unlawful executions. Later it was found out that Mehmet Bal was at the recruitment office in Yenisehir. Four lawyers went their and demanded to talk to him, which was only granted after two hours of discussion, and a phone conversation between the highest military prosecutor and the chairperson of the lawyers chamber. They were only allowed to see him for 10 minutes. Mehmet Bal declared himself a conscientious objector on 24 October 2002, and announced that he was not willing to continue to serve in the military. He presented himself on the next day, and was arrest (see TK12718-251002).

He refused to wear a uniform, and was severly mistreated. In protest he started a hunger strike (see TK12718-011102). On 27 November, Mehmet Bal was released, and got order to present himself to the recruitment office. There he got order to report to "his" unit within two days - which he didn't do.

The whole process of his arrest is very unusual. Normally a deserter would be arrested by the police.

Mehmet Bal's situation is not yet clear. Mehmet is in good spirit, and decided not to eat for the time being - until his situation is clear.

War Resisters' Internatial calls for letters of protest to the Turkish authorities, demanding the recognition of Mehmet Bal's human right to conscientious objection.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

Ahmet Nezdet Sezer
Office of the President
Cumhurbaskanligi
06100 Ankara, Turkey
Fax: +90 312 468 5026
email: cumhurbaskanligi@tccb.gov.tr

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Balgat 06100 Ankara - Turkey
Tel: +90-312-292-1000
Fax: +90-312-287-1886
E-mail : webmaster@mfa.gov.tr

TURKEY:objector Mehmet Bal released

TK12718-040203 04/02/03 13:05

War Resisters' International was informed yesterday that Mehmet Bal was released from military prison on 28 January 2003. This was a surprise to everyone involved in support conscientious objectors in Turkey. As reported earlier, Mehmet Bal was arrested by Secret Service on 22 January 2003 (see TK12718-230103), and was then transferred to Adana military prison (see TK12718-240103). In Adana Mehmet Bal was interviewed by the military prosecutor, who carefully listened to Mehmet Bal's explanations. Bal said that he is a conscientious objector and does not see himself as a deserter. The prosecutor decided to start a trial, but without keeping Mehmet Bal in prison.

He wanted to send him back to his unit, where he should get holidays, so that he would be able to spent the upcoming public holidays with his family. Back at his military unit in Mersin Mehmet Bal was accomodated in the officers' guest house. On Monday, 27 January, the commander gave order to transfer Mehmet Bal to the military hospital in Adana. There Mehmet Bal was asked to shave (to take a picture), and to fill in a questionnaire with 550 questions. Mehmet Bal refused both. As a result of this, the doctors gave him three months holidays to recover, because of "a social disturbance of his personality". He was ordered to report to the medical academy of the Turkish military in Ankara at the end of this three months period. On 28 January in the afternoon, Mehmet Bal was released.

It is still unclear why all this happened. Turkish activists think that the entire episode - arrest by Secret Service and release because of holidays for medical reasons - was planned. They expect that Mehmet Bal is supposed to be discharged for medical reasons after the three months period. Mehmet himself at present does not want to present himself after the end of his holidays, as he sees himself as a conscientious objector. It is likely that he will again be arrested in May, or later.

War Resisters' International will continue to monitor the case of Mehmet Bal. We thank all of you for your quick response and solidarity.

Andreas Speck
War Resisters' International

Mehmet Bal's declaration

I decided not to continue carrying out my military obligation, which I have been doing for 9.5 months, and to declare my conscientious objection as of 18/10/2002. Briefly, the reasons why I made this decision are as follows.

Militarism accepts destruction as method to solve problems due to its nature. By proposing some reasons which may make militarism acquitted, it tries to have the things, which it has done and will do, legitimized by the help of some laws in order to save itself from the results as well. While taking action, militarism works with the ruling class in a complete harmony in order to produce more benefit for both sides. This loop and harmony have continuity and the ones, who dare to damage this collaboration, are shut, punished even terminated. Whole history is full of such kind of events and every time the different version of same play is staged and played successfully. The situation created is so much clear and how individual tries not to see that, conscience appears every time by pointing out that the truth is undeniable.

However, the sentiment, what we call is "common sense" and which makes the people convinced every time, wants people to ignore these situations and proposes several reasons to do so. It also proposes that it would be correct action to grab a role in this game. It is usually more attractive to choose what common sense offers, but in long period, the opposite will happen contrary to what was promised.

Another core aspect of militarism is obedience, which is unconditional.

The path that takes human being to such kind of obedience is prepared carefully. Individual is forced to involve this process within the idea of defense of the country and the society, in which it is born. Individual is never asked to express him/her idea at all. Reasons are ready. The acts of people in these boundaries, which are drawn by authorities, are presented as if they are holy. The country in which you were born, even your parents have no suspicion on the holiness and correctness of them. They are ready to serve their children as victims for a reason put by someone. Actually, they already got their children prepared for such situations. Even there are some exceptions, apart from thinking over what happens, the vast majority of population cannot imagine what the opposite may be.

The damage of the wars caused by militarism and its allies are not limited to human being. What purpose could clear the responsibility of destroying the nature using nuclear or biological weapons? In fact, the owners of such weapons are already aware of the situation. It surely can not be thought that they are so stupid not to notice this dilemma.

Does not world's current situation reflect the dirty games mentioned above clearly? Everyone knows the fact that the truth underlying latest assault of US & its allies to Afghanistan under 9/11 excuse, and reason under recent Iraq scenarios is not the security.

However, everyone is surrounded by common sense. I am curious that how people could accept a scene that will be consisted of bombed corpses? Is it not the truth that USA is gaining power due to insufficient protests with a few exceptions? As a matter of fact, people should not expect a pre-determined behavior from anyone in society; the decisions have to be a result of our inner voice. How "Big Brother" is able to say 'you are from us or not', so people should be able to decide in same exact manner, whether they have a willing for war or not. The ones, who have a typical warrior logic based on 'building by destruction', are directing their guns to another people now, there is no guarantee that I will not face the same gun's barrel in future.

Taking into consideration both painful experiences coming from my life and the observations that I obtained by living in a military environment for 9.5 months, I have understood that I can not deny the voice of my conscience any more. I am declaring my CO to the public and I state that I will not carry out any obligation dictated by military, civilian, local or universal authority or by any person, institution or structure, whatever the reasons are.

I would like to explain the progress shortly. I joined the military in May 1995 as 1975-2 period numbered conscript and was arrested on 9th of September 1995 as a result of an ordinary crime which has no political overtones. After 7 years in prison, I was released on 23 May 2002 and was transferred to the military directly. I had continued the service until 18 October.

Moreover, I have no intention to escape. I am going to go to the military unit for the last time and will give back my military ID and military belongings.

Mehmet Bal

The case of conscientious objector Osman Murat Ülke

Osman Murat Ülke was the first Turkish conscientious objector who was arrested for his conscientious objection. He burnt his military papers publicly in a press conference in Izmir on 1 September 1995, but was only arrested one year later. He spent more than two years in prison, and was charged and sentenced repeatedly. After 2 1/2 years in prison he was released, but again supposed to report to "his" military unit in Bilecik, which he did not do. He is presently living openly in Izmir, but is legally a deserter.

The documents about his case included in this documentation are only a few examples, and cannot give a complete overview.

His "case" is also part of the legal documents, which are incluced in this documentation too.

9 October 1996

ISKD (Izmir Savas Karsitlari Dernegi - Izmir War Resisters' Association) President and Conscientious Objector Osman Murat Ülke has been arrested

Osman Murat Ulke was detained on 7 October, 1996, as a result of his declaration of conscientious objection more than a year ago. He is currently awaiting interrogation in Buca Prison, Izmir.

Once the interrogation has taken place, the military prosecutor will bring a new suit against him, standing to the Article 155 ("alienating people from military service") in the Turkish Penal Code. The article is used widely against war resisters. It not only violates the freedom of thought and expression, but also prevents the army and militarism from criticism.

It has taken over a year to arrest Osman, even though he has not been in hiding and has continued his everyday life. The written orders of the military prosecutor from Military Court of General Staff in Ankara, leading to his arrest on 8 October, 1996, were dated 5 September, 1995. They were received by the local police station on 1 October, 1996!

Izmir SKD believes that in a country where there is war, and basic human rights are violated systematically as a state policy, a conscientious objector would not be safe in the hands of the state and military forces. Three political prisoners were murdered as a result of state intervention in Buca prison less than one and a half years ago. The Turkish State must be held responsible for any inhuman treatment on Osman Murat Ulke, who is currently residing in that same prison.

Please send protest messages to the following fax numbers.

# General Staff: + 99 - 312 - 418 53 41
# Prime Ministry: + 99 - 312 - 417 04 76
# Minister of Justice: + 99 - 312 - 417 39 54
# Ministry of National Defence: + 99 - 312 - 324 46 27

IZMIR WAR RESISTERS' ASSOCIATION

Background Information

On 17 May 1994, Istanbul War Resisters' Association held a press conference against conscription, which led to the closure of the Association by the state, and the arrest of four people, including Osman Murat Ülke. That trial concluded on 29 August 1995. While his co-defendants were sentenced to between two and six months' imprisonment, Osman was taken to Cankaya Recruiting Office and enlisted as a conscript. The Recruiting Office allowed him to return home for two days to prepare, then requested him to report back on 31st August to the 9th Constable Soldier Drilling Regiment in Bilecik, Bursa.

Instead, Osman held a press conference in Izmir on 1 September, 1995, International Peace Day. Here he declared his conscientious objection, and burnt his military pass.

Appendix: The statement of Osman Murat Ulke, 1 September 1995 - the reason for his arrest

Good day. This press conference has not been organised by ISKD. I am personally responsible for this meeting.

As you know, the trial in the Ankara General Staff Military Court in which we were accused of "alienating people from military service" came to its conclusion on 29 August 29.

The Chairperson of the closed-down Istanbul SKD, Arif Hikmet Iyidogan, was sentenced to six months in prison, university student Gokhan Demirkiran to four months, Mehmet Sefa Fersal to two months. I have been acquitted. But, during the trial, and although it was not related to the matter of the trial, the judge asked if we had gone to military service. As I admitted I had not, I was taken to Cankaya Recruiting Office.

The Army, unable to overpower us through jurisprudence, now deems necessary to distance the war resisters from public opinion with such an act.

Before all I am not a draft evader, but a conscientious objector.

I neither think to escape nor to go to conscription. I have no reason to escape conscription, because I am in favour of people using their right not to be conscripted without having to hide.

According to the papers given by the Recruiting Office I am recognised as a conscript and it claimed that I should go to the 9th Constable Soldier drilling Regiment in Bilecik, on 31 August.

As you see, I have not gone, I am here. Even though I cannot be called a draft evader, I consider it meaningless to go of my own accord. On the contrary, here and now, I will burn this Military Pass against which my own will rebels. In addition, I will burn the notification paper and give back the rest of the documents to the 10 state by mail. Perhaps they will need them. Also I will send back the 101.000 TL that was given to me by the ¥ankaya Recruiting Office for transportation and food expenses.

I am not a soldier and I will never be. Of course I am aware that I will be taken by force. But until I am taken, there will be no change in my daily routine. they can find me here in order to take me by force. But I want to stress that I will resist in the barracks until the end and never perform military service.

Osman Murat Ülke
September 1, 1995
Izmir

Osman concluded his speech before the verdict on 29 August 1995 as follows:

"Our aim is not that conscientious objection become law: conscience cannot be restrained by laws. Our cause is to activate the self will-power of individuals against the war machine which clearly has no conscience."

Osman's original declaration of objection, 1994

In view of my deepest convictions and way of life, it is impossible for me to take part in military service or any other compulsory service.

Furthermore I refuse to acknowledge any kind of hierarchical authority. In my opinion the army is the clearest form of institutional power, which makes it a personal enemy I seek to combat and destroy. This is why I consider conscientious objection as the first step on the path I have to follow to preserve my self- esteem.

Turkey is based on an authoritarian culture that pervades all dimensions of life at work, in the private sphere, and - especially strongly - the political arena. It is therefore not surprising that a large part of the population turns a blind eye to the war that Turkey is currently waging and continue in their way of life. The myth perpetuated about the role of soldiers as protectors of their country and fellow citizens from the outside enemy has turned them into one of the most commonly used instruments of oppression in their own country. I cannot say how big a difference I and those who think like me can make, but I do know that no coercive measure will ever force me to become a soldier.

Osman Murat Ulke is a conscientious objector to military service.

Following a military trial of Osman Murat Ulke on 29-8-95 in Ankara, Osman - although acquitted - was brought to the recruitment office to start his military service. He was given a military passport and a call-up to report on 31 August 1995 to the commander of the 9th Gendarmerie in Bilecik (province Bursa) for basic military training.

However, on 1 September 1995 he organised a press conference during which he publicly declared not to be a soldier and never to be one. (...)

On 7 October 1996, more than a year later, Osman was arrested because of the burning of his military papers. He was accused of violation of article 155 TCK that renders punishable 'every attempt to alienate the people from the armed forces'.

This trial, before the military court in Ankara, has not come to a conclusion. After the first session on 19-11-96 Osman was released from military prison, but immediately brought to 'his' unit in Bilecik. In Bilecik, he again declared not to be a soldier nor to become one, and therefore refused to obey and order. He was then imprisoned and accused of disobedience (article 87/1 TACK). He was heard by the military judges on 11 December 1996.

The trial might lead to a prison sentence between six months and two years.

So now there are two court cases against Osman Murat Ulke.

1. Firstly, Osman is charged for 'alienating the people form the armed forces', an offense of article 155 of Turkish Penal Law (TCK).

He is accused because of publicly declaring that he is a conscientious objector. It is not the act of objecting itself, but the publicity that Osman has given to this act is an offense of article 155.

Therefore this trial can be seen as an attempt of the armed forces to limit the freedom of expression of Osman.

The next trial session in this case will be on 28 January 1997 in the military court in Ankara.

2. Secondly, Osman is charged for 'disobedience', an offense under the article 87 of Turkish Miltary Penal Law (TACK). In Osman's case also article 45 TACK is very important. This trial has great importance because Turkey has no provision for conscripts who have strong conscientious objectors against performance of military service. The United Nations have recegnised the right to conscientious objection in Resolution 89/59 of the Human Rights Commission of the UN. The case of Osman is one of the first in Turkey in which a conscript with serious conscientious objections is tried because of refusal to perform military service. This case is therefore a testcase to see to what extent Turkey has implemented international accepted standards into its legal system.

The next trial session will be on 30 January 1997 in the military court. It might be possible that this session cannot take place, due to procedural problems.

Bart Horeman, 30 DECEMBER 1996

Osman sentenced for "continuing disobedience"

Peace News No 2412, April 1997

Turkish war resister Osman Murat Ülke was sentenced to 5 months imprisonment on 6 March for "continuing disobedience in a military unit". When he completes his sentence at the beginning of April, he will again be taken to the 9th Constable Training Unit in Bilecik where he will again refuse to soldier and again be charged with "disobedience". And again sent back to Esiksehir Military Prison.

Meanwhile he is expecting a charge of "desertion" for not reporting for duty upon his release from military prison in December, and on 1 April Osman with 11 others will face trial under Article 155 for an anti-militarist declaration published in a book by the Turkish Human Rights Association.

While to the outside world, it must seem that Osman is trapped in a never-ending loop of punishments, Osman remains in good spirits, determined to resist, and several colleagues in the (now-banned) ISKD (Izmir War Resisters Association) are preparing to take the same path.

The German church group EAK (Evangelische Arbeitsgemeinschaft zur Betreuung der Kriegsdienstverweigerer) has awarded its Friedrich Siegmund-Schultze prize jointly to the Izmir War Resisters and to the Association of Greek Conscientious Objectors.

International support is vital to the ISKD strategy, so please write either a message of support to Osman or a protest to the Turkish embassy in your country, or preferably both! 15 May - International Conscientious Objection Day - will this year focus on Turkey. Anti-militarist groups in several countries have decided to focus on the situation in Turkey.

The Turkish CO Movement

List of declared Turkish COs

 DateNamePlace of declaration
11990Tayfun GönülİZMİR
21990Vedat ZencirİZMİR
31993, 16 JanuaryAykut TemizerİZMİR
41993, 16 JanuaryErkan ÇalpurİZMİR
51993, 16 JanuaryMenderes MeletliİZMİR
61993, 16 JanuaryAtilla AkarİZMİR
71993, 16 JanuaryYusuf (Doğan)İZMİR
81993, 16 JanuaryAhmet Nazım HürİZMİR
91993Salih AskeroğluCyprus
101993, MarchYavuz AtanİSTANBUL
111994, 17 MayGökhan DemirkıranİSTANBUL
121994, 17 MayMehmet Sefa FersalİSTANBUL
131994, 17 MayArif Hikmet İyidoğanİSTANBUL
141995, 1 SeptemberOsman Murat ÜlkeİZMİR
152000, 15 MayUğur YorulmazİSTANBUL
162000, 15 MayTimuçin KızılayİSTANBUL
172000, 15 MayHasan ÇimenİSTANBUL
182001, 27 OctoberMehmet TarhanİSTANBUL
192001, 27 OctoberErdem YalçınkayaİSTANBUL
202003, 22 JanuaryMehmet BalMERSİN
212003, 24 JanuaryErkan ErsözİSTANBUL
222003, 24 JanuarySertaç GirginİSTANBUL
232003, 24 JanuaryEmir ÜnerİSTANBUL
242003, 24 JanuaryMustafa ŞeyhoğluİSTANBUL
252003, 15 MaySami Serkan KazakİSTANBUL
262003, 15 MayAhmet Cem ÖztürkİSTANBUL
272003, 20 NovemberTuğkan TuğİZMİR
282004, 15 MayMahmut ElkışİSTANBUL
292004, 15 MayCemal KarakuşİSTANBUL
302004, 15 MayErsan Uğur GörİSTANBUL
312004, 15 MayÖzhan YıldızİSTANBUL
322004, 15 MayYaşar ÖnerİSTANBUL
332004, 15 MaySavaş Görgünliving abroad
342004, 15 MayMustafa Nur Sezerliving abroad
352004, 15 Mayİnci AğlagülİSTANBUL
362004, 15 MayEbru TopalİSTANBUL
372004, 15 MayYöntem YurtsevenİSTANBUL
382004, 15 MayNazan AskeranİSTANBUL
392004, 15 MayHürriyet ŞenerİSTANBUL
402004, 15 MayZeynep AslanİSTANBUL
412004, 27 JuneDoğan GüzelİSTANBUL
422004, 27 JuneSinan DündarİSTANBUL
432004, 5 SeptemberÖmer SezerANKARA
442004, 5 Septemberİmdat ŞanlıANKARA
452004, 5 Septemberİsmail SabancıANKARA
462004, 5 SeptemberSalih ArıkanANKARA
472004, 5 SeptemberHasan AkyürekANKARA
482004, 5 SeptemberLevent DuranyanANKARA
492004, 23 SeptemberCeylan ÖzerenginİSTANBUL
502004, 04 OctoberŞahin ÖzbayİSTANBUL
512004, 28 OctoberNecdet ÖzaktınİSTANBUL
522004, 26 NovemberHalil SavdaİSTANBUL
532004Necati BalbayİSTANBUL
542004, 18 DecemberVeli AkdağİZMİR

Turkey: from invasion to resistance

The constitution calls it "fatherland service" and requires all male Turkish citizens over 20 years old to do military service.

Yet, despite the strength of Turkey's militarist traditions, for years there has been widespread avoidance of conscription.

It used to be official: anyone could have their military service reduced to a month's basic training simply by paying a "ransom".

Others took advantage of the inefficiencies of Turkish bureaucracy or deferments such as those available to students. Somehow, even though their military registration number is included on their identity cards, the sons of the rich and influential seemed to find it especially easy to avoid doing military service.

However, since December 1993 the Turkish government, wanting to bring the undeclared war in the south-east (Kurdistan) to an end, has been taking measures to deal with its military manpower (sic) problems. Estimating there were 250,000 deserters and draft evaders, it issued an ultimatum: report by May or else face a prison sentence of up to three years, plus military service.

According to official figures, only 50,000 reported, and so in February 1994 the "ransom" option - set at 10,000 DM - was restricted to Turks living abroad. Before long military service was lengthened, from 15 to 18 months.

At the same time, it has not wanted to tackle head-on anyone's determined refusal to fight. The first public objectors in 1990 were anarchists, Tayfun Gönül and Vedat Zencir. For Tayfun, "conscientious objection is a political act, a way of making the army debatable. In Turkey, for historical reasons, the army is taboo. Turkey was founded by military officers. That is why the use of force has a secure place in Turkish culture. The male has a dominant position, war heroes are idolised". Keeping the army above debate, the authorities charged him not with refusing to do military service, but under Article 155 of the Turkish Penal Code, "alienating the people from the military". Tayfun and Vedat were fined in 1990.

Founding of War Resisters' Association

They were two of the founders of Savas Karsitlari Dernegi (War Resisters' Association) in Izmir in December 1992. The group's aims were support for objectors and public consciousness- raising against the war. At the outset, SKD embarked on a strategy of confrontation. Within a month of its foundation, six members called a press conference to declare their objection.

The authorities did not react. SKD then initiated a Peace Journey to Kurdistan, involving other non-governmental groups in Izmir, which in turn led to the Izmir Peace Platform - a coordination of groups campaigning against the war. In July, without permission, the group hosted the International CO Meeting which also attracted anti-militarists from other parts of Turkey.

In Turkey, all associations are supposed to register with the government. In November 1993, the government refused to accept SKD in Izmir. This did not stop activity. Indeed in February 1994 a new Izmir SKD, with a new constitution, was launched and embarked on the lengthy process of registration.

After a TV interview about CO in December 1993, two SKD members - Aytek Özel and Menderes Meltli - were arrested for contravening Article 155, leading to a sentence of one year and 15 days for Aytek (Menderes went into hiding). At least ten peace activists, five journalists and a committee of a branch of the Human Rights Association have since been charged under Article 155.

The biggest case followed a press conference of the Istanbul SKD. Istanbul SKD had been set up in September 1993 with a somewhat different orientation to Izmir, less anarchist and more socialist, not united against all war but primarily against the war in Kurdistan. In May 1994, two days after International CO Day which had focused on Turkey, and two days before the government ultimatum to evaders expired, they called a press conference.

Their president, Arif Hikmet Iyidogan, urged conscripts not to answer the call-up and demanded the right to CO in Turkey.

Osman Murat Ülke stated that Izmir shared these views, and then three objectors declared that they refused military service.

Arrests swiftly followed, of SKD members and of members of a German delegation, and Istanbul SKD was itself declared illegal.

Arif, Osman, Mehmet Sefa Fersal and Gökhan Demirkiran were all charged under Article 155.

Held in Mamak Military Prison awaiting trial for over two months, Arif was forced to wear military uniform, although he successfully refused military training. At one court hearing, however, he dramatically took off the military uniform, declaring that he would never become a soldier.

The case concluded over a year later, on 29 August 1995, when Arif was sentenced to six months, Gökhan to four, and Mehmet to two. Osman was acquitted as he had not been one of the organisers, but was straightaway taken to the recruiting office and ordered to join a military unit. Instead, on 1 September 1995, Osman burnt his military papers at a press conference, declaring "I am not a draft evader, but a conscientious objector".

Building solid structures

Throughout the period of this trial, Izmir SKD had been following a quieter, non-confrontational strategy to give their movement a sound basis. This meant building solid structures in Turkey and integrating with an international network; preparing the first COs "to go through fire and water"; and establishing CO as an independent concept that could not be hi-jacked by groups advocating class warfare or war for national independence.

Osman burning his military papers marked a new phase. Behind him are others, also prepared to go public and to take consequences of their objection. The days of evasion are not over, but perhaps the days of resistance have arrived.

The Broken Rifle No 37, November 1996
http://wri-irg.org/pubs/pfp96-en.htm#Heading3

Resisting militarism in Turkey

Serdar Tekin of ISKD (Izmir War Resisters) reflects on the impact that Osman Murat Ülke's well-publicised conscientious objection has had in Turkey.

In Turkey, all men over 20 are required to do 18 months of what the Constitution euphemistically calls "Fatherland service".

Despite our country's strong militarist tradition, for years there has been widespread avoidance of conscription: by buying oneself out; by taking advantage of deferments; by evading the draft; or by deserting.

In 1990, however, for the first time a conscientious objector publicly announced he was refusing the draft. His friends and supporters followed his case anxiously. More objectors publicly followed suit. Most of them were not draft evaders, and they continued their political activities openly. They were judged in military courts, sentenced and imprisoned, but never officially on charges of conscientious objection. They were not even ordered to report to the military after serving their sentence and we started to think that it was the state's policy to ignore conscientious objectors, since it is well known that prisoners can become all too famous.

More than a year ago, however, Osman Murat Ülke ("Ossi") was arrested and the real examination of conscientious objection began. In ISKD (Izmir War Resisters), we became aware that the prison and military authorities - those responsible for oppressing him and attempting to break his resistance - also felt some respect towards him. Rather than simply criticising his opponents, Ossi was successful in explaining clearly the reasons for his action.

His honest, decisive, and rational attitude made his time in prison a lot less difficult than we had expected, as did his high level of consciousness as a war resister - even in times of duress he knew what he could or could not accept.

CO and the Turkish left

For us, outside the prison, the first days were incredibly tiring and tense. We were concerned for his life, but discovered, with some surprise, that many people supported us. Even some leftist groups - which have traditionally been involved in violent and conspiratorial struggles - were impressed by his action and concerned about his fate.

But still they did not take up conscientious objection as one of their own struggles - for three essential reasons: firstly, we are against all wars; secondly, we advocate nonviolence (and for them, this means we are against revolutionary violence as well); and thirdly, they tend to misunderstand the concept of conscientious objection - viewing it as an individual resistance, rather than as an avenue for social change.

We believe that conscientious objection is not only a matter of nonviolent revolution", or a so-called "utopian idea", but also a matter of human rights, especially in a country where a war - against the Kurdish people - is still going on. So, we try to explain to other groups that we do not need to have identical political views to work together against the army - the institution most responsible for the militarisation of society and the violation of human rights. The development of conscientious objection and antimilitarism in Turkey will not just depend on the efforts of pacifists - it will also depend on the evolution of the left in general.

The general public

Ossi's case has had two main effects on the public: it has raised and explained the notion of conscientious objection; and it has made CO a practical option, something possible and marlageable.

It is not a heroic act from the past, but something that is going on now. And the actor is just one of us.

International solidarity

The support we have received from outside Turkey has been even stronger than we expected. This did not come entirely as a surprise, since we had been involved in international work for years. We were able to count on the support of the Alert Network in Germany and of the War Resisters' International (both from its groups and the central office). There were also the international or European CO meetings and long speaking tours in several European countries. After one year it is still difficult to assess the full extent of international concern, but it obviously took the authorities by surprise. It certainly threw the director of the Mamak military prison into a right state of panic at the time of Ossi's hunger strike, shortly after his first arrest.

In the future each new arrest of conscientious objectors will necessitate the launch of new campaigns. But there are also other forms of international co-operation, covering other areas of the anti-militarist struggle, which could advance the CO movement here. For our part, we believe that the promotion of nonviolence for example through trainings and the publication of written material - will have a decisive impact on the future of anti-militarism in Turkey.

The Broken Rifle No 40, November 1997
http://wri-irg.org/pubs/pfp97-en.htm#Heading14

"To live is to resist" - letter from Ossi

Dear Peace News readers,

I'm Ossi. As many of you know I was imprisoned because of my conscientious objection to military service in Turkey. After my first imprisonment in October '96, I was released in December '96 and went back to court again in January '97 - to be imprisoned again. I got released in May '97 and went back in October '97. This was meant to be my last courtroom confrontation.

But this time the recruitment office took the initiative and decided not to let me go free after the military court released me. So I was imprisoned again and again, until my lawyers managed to get me out on 9th of March this year!

During the two years I've spent in prisons, barracks and recruitment offices (as stop-overs during transportation) the legal situation hasn't developed much. I still "belong to the army", which means that I'm actually in the position of a being a deserter and could be imprisoned again at any time. On the other hand it seems that the military is not too keen on imprisoning me, because this would just carry on the confrontation-without breaking my will.

Many people might wonder if this story makes sense, if it's worth going through with all of this. Isn't this way of acting just martyrdom? Instead of working out political arguments, I would like to answer with a simple story taken from my daily life in prison.

When I first arrived in Eskisehir Military Prison in November '96, I was put in a community room (with a capacity for twelve persons).

I was the only one who didn't wear a uniform (I refused and reminded the prison authorities of my previous hunger strike in Mamak Military Prison , Ankara). My room mates had been warned about me. After two days of getting known each other, silence fell all around me. Only one Islamist went on talking with me, but that's another story.

After a while I realised that there was an embargo against me and the main person responsible was the community leader.

He was a convinced fascist and had already spent two years in prison for killing somebody (for economic reasons). Let's call him "Ahmet".

It was very difficult for me to live with this social stress. I was used to resisting the authorities, but how can you live in a small room full of people who don't want to share a single word with you?Within one month I was released. However, I soon returnedas you know. This time my roommates were quite surprised, because they saw that my stay there was not a coincidence or something outside my will. They realised that I was serious about all that nonsense about conscientious objection and that I chose to be there. Ahmet especially had difficulties accepting this and so he started discussing it with me. After a while we came to the point of living peacefully together. Although our thoughts were contradictory, he began to respect me, followed by a kind of friendship. Observing my behaviour in prison, Ahmet tried more and more to understand my principles. So we began to discuss, in a more relaxed way, ethics, religion, anthropology, history, nationalism, psychology and so on. He was reading the books my friends brought me and one day one of these books acted like an explosion inside him. It was a basic introductory book about the history of Western philosophy. After that book, Ahmet's questions concerning anything you could imagine flooded through and out of him.

After nearly two years of knowing each other, his rate of change gets faster and faster. In one of our night-conversations he told me that this was only possible, because he trusted that I wouldn't try to indoctrinate him. So, step by step prison life also started to change. Ahmet was responsible for the twelve-man community, but didn't want to continue in that position. On the other hand everybody was used to living with this strict hierarchy. Ahmet couldn't withdraw, because we all knew that the situation would become worse. We-all together-slowly tried to create a more human and democratic atmosphere. That was quite difficult, because people who are used to being governed interpret this as a sign of weakness. The outcome is often chaos, instead of democracy. On the other hand the prison authorities and warders always are always looking for chances to intervene and control life in the community rooms.

We haven't created a pure oasis, but at least reached consensus about externalising physical violence and things like that. But most important for me is to have known Ahmet, to have observed the process he has gone through. To have a real example of how somebody can change. When I was finally released, he had been in prison for four years and there were thirteen years left to go. Now I'm trying not to lose contact.

Of course this story is not the whole answer and I didn't decide to be a CO to get acquainted with somebody like Ahmet-but this experience and many others have shown me again and again that it is worth insisting on being your self and of following your will. I've never had the feeling that I've spent my time without purpose during my stays in prison. On the contrary, these years have made it once again clear to me: to live is to resist.

I would like to end with a few words to the Peace News readers and Amnesty International activists, who showed me their solidarity throughout these years. I never received your letters, but when it became clear that the army was interrupting the flow of letters coming my way, my group, the Izmir War Resisters' Association, started to collect them. In just three months more than 2.500 letters arrived in Izmir. Even though I couldn't read them, my friends told me about the flow. Upon release, one of the first things I did was to examine this mountain of post. I'll never finish them all! So, thank you very very much for being with me.

Yours,
Ossi
(Osman Murat Ulke)

The Broken Rifle No 44, November 1999
http://wri-irg.org/pubs/pfp99-en.htm#pfp99oss

Movement Lifeline of the Turkish Conscientious Objectors' Movement

Source: A Movement Action Plan for Turkey? Documentation of a seminar in Sigacik from 4-8 April 1998, http://people.freenet.de/ask/map_turkey.html

May 18, 2000: Three New Conscientious Objectors on Anti-Militarist Festival

On 14th of May, IAMI (Istanbul Anti-Militarist Initiative) organized an anti-militarist festival in Istanbul -for the annual of World Conscientious Objectors (15th of May). The festival was supported by anarchist groups from Ankara and Istanbul, ISKD (Izmir War Resisters Association), and ASKD Giri imi (Ankara War Resisters Initiative). There were also some guests from abroad -Germany and Italy. Legal permission for the festival was taken by ÖDP (Freedom and Solidarity Party).

The fes